Consumer Price Index, CPI-U (CUURS49ASA0) · All items in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA, not seasonally adjusted
What is the consumer price index in the Los Angeles area?
The consumer price index for all items in the Los Angeles area was 358.7 in the month ended , up 3.7% from a year earlier.
Consumer price index for all items in the Los Angeles area, not seasonally adjusted, each month
Shaded bands are US recessions as the National Bureau of Economic Research dates them: to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to .
Shaded bands are US recessions as the National Bureau of Economic Research dates them: to .
Consumer price index for all items in the Los Angeles area, change from a year earlier, each month (ours)
Shaded bands are US recessions as the National Bureau of Economic Research dates them: to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to , to .
Shaded bands are US recessions as the National Bureau of Economic Research dates them: to .
Each point is one month of the series as the source publishes it, or a change worked out from those values (ours). The US recessions are shaded. Pointing at the chart shows the month and the value.
Select a line to follow
Inspect and compare dates
The newest month beside the one before it and the nearest ones a year, five and ten years earlier. The last ten years are in the table under "The numbers behind the chart".
| Measure | Latest | The month before | A year earlier | Five years earlier | Ten years earlier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Month | |||||
| Consumer price index for all items in the Los Angeles area | 358.7 | 357.0 | 345.9 | 292.2 | 250.1 |
| Change over a year | +3.7% | +3.6% | +3.5% | +4.6% | +1.9% |
The table scrolls sideways; the first column stays in place.
Observed .
Right now
The consumer price index for all items in the Los Angeles area was 358.7 in September 2026, the highest since our record begins in December 1914.
Over a year it is up 3.7% (ours).
ChangeOurs
| Period | Then | Change |
|---|---|---|
| One month | 357.0 in | +0.5% |
| Three months | 354.3 in | +1.2% |
| Twelve months | 345.9 in | +3.7% |
| Five years | 292.2 in | +22.8% |
| Ten years | 250.1 in | +43.4% |
In historyOurs
The consumer price index for all items in the Los Angeles area of 358.7 in was higher than in 1,097 of the 1,097 other months since , the same in 0 and lower in 0.
Highest since : 358.7 in . Lowest since : 10.1 in .
AverageOurs
Average since : 115.14 (ours, a plain mean of the 1,098 months).
ComparedOurs
Over a year the consumer price index for all items in the Los Angeles area is up 3.7%, which ranks 16 of the 36 rows of the table, where 1 is the largest change.
The table sets the consumer price index for all items in the Los Angeles area beside the regions, divisions and metropolitan areas on the inflation by area page, by the change over a year in each one's newest month.
Understanding the consumer price index for all items in the Los Angeles area
Where it stands today
The consumer price index for all items in the Los Angeles area was 358.7 in September 2026.
What does the consumer price index for all items in the Los Angeles area measure?
This is the consumer price index for all items in the Los Angeles area: the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers (CPI-U) of the area. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) publishes it each month, about two weeks after the month ends, and scales it so that the 1982-84 average is 100. BLS calls the area Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA, and the index is for the urban consumers who live there.
Read more
What 500metrics adds: the change over one month, three months, a year and five years, the highest and lowest value since the series begins, how the change over a year ranks among the regions, divisions and metropolitan areas on the inflation by area page, and the history in one chart and one file.
The numbers behind the chart
What was the consumer price index for all items in the Los Angeles area in each month?The last ten years, 119 months, newest first; the chart and the file have every month since Dec 1914
| Month | Value | Change over a year |
|---|---|---|
| 358.7 | +3.7% | |
| 357.0 | +3.6% | |
| 355.3 | +3.4% | |
| 354.3 | +3.3% | |
| 355.3 | +3.6% | |
| 355.2 | +3.7% | |
| 352.2 | +3.4% | |
| 348.4 | +2.9% | |
| 347.7 | +3.0% | |
| 344.6 | +3.0% | |
| 345.7 | +3.6% | |
| 345.9 | +3.5% | |
| 344.5 | +3.3% | |
| 343.6 | +3.2% | |
| 343.0 | +3.2% | |
| 343.0 | +3.0% | |
| 342.6 | +3.0% | |
| 340.6 | +3.0% | |
| 338.4 | +3.1% | |
| 337.5 | +3.3% | |
| 334.5 | +3.4% | |
| 333.7 | +3.2% | |
| 334.2 | +3.0% | |
| 334.1 | +2.8% |
Show 95 more rows
| Month | Value | Change over a year |
|---|---|---|
| 333.4 | +2.9% | |
| 332.9 | +3.4% | |
| 332.4 | +3.2% | |
| 333.0 | +3.9% | |
| 332.6 | +3.9% | |
| 330.7 | +4.0% | |
| 328.2 | +3.4% | |
| 326.6 | +2.5% | |
| 323.5 | +3.5% | |
| 323.3 | +2.8% | |
| 324.5 | +2.4% | |
| 325.0 | +3.2% | |
| 324.1 | +3.3% | |
| 321.9 | +2.7% | |
| 322.1 | +2.5% | |
| 320.5 | +3.2% | |
| 320.1 | +3.8% | |
| 317.9 | +3.7% | |
| 317.6 | +5.1% | |
| 318.6 | +5.8% | |
| 312.6 | +4.9% | |
| 314.6 | +6.0% | |
| 317.0 | +7.5% | |
| 315.0 | +7.8% | |
| 313.6 | +7.6% | |
| 313.4 | +7.7% | |
| 314.1 | +8.6% | |
| 310.6 | +8.0% | |
| 308.3 | +7.9% | |
| 306.7 | +8.5% | |
| 302.2 | +7.4% | |
| 301.2 | +7.5% | |
| 297.9 | +6.6% | |
| 296.8 | +6.0% | |
| 295.0 | +5.4% | |
| 292.2 | +4.6% | |
| 291.3 | +4.0% | |
| 290.9 | +3.9% | |
| 289.2 | +4.0% | |
| 287.6 | +3.9% | |
| 285.8 | +3.6% | |
| 282.6 | +2.2% | |
| 281.3 | +1.0% | |
| 280.2 | +0.9% | |
| 279.6 | +1.5% | |
| 280.1 | +1.0% | |
| 279.9 | +0.7% | |
| 279.4 | +1.2% | |
| 280.1 | +2.0% | |
| 279.9 | +1.9% | |
| 278.1 | +1.4% | |
| 276.8 | +0.9% | |
| 275.9 | +0.7% | |
| 276.6 | +1.9% | |
| 278.7 | +3.4% | |
| 277.8 | +3.1% | |
| 275.6 | +3.0% | |
| 277.2 | +3.2% | |
| 278.1 | +3.2% | |
| 276.1 | +3.0% | |
| 274.6 | +3.0% | |
| 274.7 | +3.3% | |
| 274.4 | +3.3% | |
| 274.5 | +3.1% | |
| 273.9 | +3.3% | |
| 271.3 | +2.7% | |
| 269.6 | +2.5% | |
| 269.5 | +3.2% | |
| 267.6 | +3.2% | |
| 268.6 | +3.6% | |
| 269.5 | +4.1% | |
| 268.0 | +3.9% | |
| 266.7 | +3.9% | |
| 266.0 | +3.9% | |
| 265.5 | +4.0% | |
| 266.1 | +4.1% | |
| 265.1 | +4.0% | |
| 264.2 | +3.8% | |
| 263.0 | +3.6% | |
| 261.2 | +3.5% | |
| 259.2 | +3.6% | |
| 259.1 | +3.6% | |
| 258.9 | +3.1% | |
| 257.9 | +3.1% | |
| 256.7 | +2.8% | |
| 256.0 | +2.5% | |
| 255.3 | +2.2% | |
| 255.7 | +2.5% | |
| 255.0 | +2.7% | |
| 254.5 | +2.7% | |
| 253.8 | +2.7% | |
| 252.4 | +2.1% | |
| 250.2 | +2.0% | |
| 250.2 | +1.8% | |
| 251.1 | +2.2% |
How does it compare with the regions, divisions and metropolitan areas on the inflation by area page?Ranked by the change over a year
| Series | Month | Value | Change over a year | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urban Hawaii | 368.6 | +5.2% | 1 | |
| San Diego | 409.0 | +4.7% | 2 | |
| New York | 363.9 | +4.5% | 3 | |
| Seattle | 381.1 | +4.4% | 4 | |
| East North Central | 136.2 | +4.3% | 5 | |
| New England | 133.8 | +4.3% | 5 | |
| East South Central | 137.5 | +4.2% | 7 | |
| Middle Atlantic | 135.2 | +4.2% | 7 | |
| Midwest region | 314.4 | +4.2% | 7 | |
| Northeast region | 351.6 | +4.2% | 7 | |
| Philadelphia | 340.0 | +4.2% | 7 | |
| Washington, DC | 338.7 | +4.1% | 12 | |
| West North Central | 136.6 | +4.1% | 12 | |
| Denver | 353.4 | +4.0% | 14 | |
| Boston | 362.6 | +3.8% | 15 | |
| Detroit | 310.8 | +3.7% | 16 | |
| Los Angeles (this page) | 358.7 | +3.7% | 16 | |
| Miami | 370.1 | +3.7% | 16 | |
| Minneapolis-St. Paul | 321.7 | +3.6% | 19 | |
| Riverside | 143.0 | +3.6% | 19 | |
| Pacific | 138.4 | +3.5% | 21 | |
| South Atlantic | 138.3 | +3.5% | 21 | |
| San Francisco | 370.1 | +3.4% | 23 | |
| South region | 325.1 | +3.4% | 23 | |
| West region | 357.1 | +3.4% | 23 | |
| Mountain | 140.0 | +3.3% | 26 | |
| Urban Alaska | 282.9 | +3.3% | 26 | |
| Dallas-Fort Worth | 313.2 | +3.0% | 28 | |
| West South Central | 132.2 | +3.0% | 28 | |
| Atlanta | 328.2 | +2.9% | 30 | |
| Chicago | 313.4 | +2.9% | 30 | |
| St. Louis | 302.7 | +2.9% | 30 | |
| Phoenix | 191.7 | +2.5% | 33 | |
| Baltimore | 333.8 | +2.3% | 34 | |
| Tampa | 315.6 | +1.9% | 35 | |
| Houston | 282.3 | +1.3% | 36 |
The table scrolls sideways; the first column stays in place.
What do these figures leave out, and how are they cited?Limits, dates and how to cite
What this number cannot tell you
- The index measures the change of prices in the area, not how high prices are there. Each area is scaled to 100 at a base period of its own (the 1982-84 average is 100 here), so the level of one area cannot be set beside the level of another: only the changes can.
- The values are not adjusted for the season, as BLS publishes them for areas. A change from one month to the next can include the usual swings of the calendar year; a change over a year does not.
- BLS did not collect prices for October 2025 because of the lapse in appropriations. Where BLS publishes no value for that month, the page has none and the chart shows a gap.
- The index is shown to one decimal, but the changes, the ranks and the highest and lowest values are ours, worked out from the values BLS publishes, which have three. A change is in percent, and can differ by 0.1 from one worked out from the values as shown.
Observed . Checked .
How to cite this
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Consumer Price Index, All items in Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA, not seasonally adjusted, through September 2026. Compiled by 500metrics, "What is the consumer price index in the Los Angeles area?", https://500metrics.com/inflation-by-area/los-angeles.
Can the data be downloaded?inflation-by-area-los-angeles.csv
Download the full history as CSV: 1,098 rows, to , 19,746 bytes.
Our text and compilation: CC BY 4.0.
Recession dates from the National Bureau of Economic Research.
Page updated